Skip to content

New projects

Peer Review & Compliance

An independent second read of the structural design — code compliance, load path, constructability and documentation quality.

Applies to
New construction
Coverage
Miami-Dade & Broward County, Florida

When you need it

A second read before the drawings go out.

By the time a structural problem is found in construction, it is a schedule event. An independent review before the set is issued is the cheapest risk reduction available on a project.

  • 01A lender, insurer or owner requires an independent structural review before construction.
  • 02A drawing set is about to be issued and nobody outside the design team has read it.
  • 03Something in the structure worries you and you want a second engineer to look, not to redesign.

Owners and developers managing structural risk · Design teams seeking an independent check · Lenders and insurers requiring third-party review

Scope & deliverables

What's included

  1. Independent review of structural drawings and calculations
  2. Code compliance and load-path continuity check
  3. Review of analysis assumptions and modeling
  4. Constructability and detailing review
  5. Documentation completeness and coordination review
  6. Review of the design team’s responses until every comment is closed

What you receive

  1. Independent review report
  2. Prioritized comment log
  3. Resolution tracking through close-out

Next step

Send the drawing set and calculations, and say what the review is for. You receive a fixed-fee proposal for the depth of review that matches it.

How the work runs

01

Scope the review

Depth agreed up front — full review, targeted systems, or a specific concern.

02

Review

Drawings, calculations and models read independently against the governing code.

03

Comment

Findings issued as a structured comment log, prioritized by structural consequence.

04

Close out

Responses reviewed and comments tracked to closure so the record is complete.

Good to know

What changes the scope — and what no engineer can promise.

  • A peer review examines the design as submitted; it does not transfer engineer-of-record responsibility.
  • Review depth and fee scale with the size and complexity of the set.
  • Comments are written to be resolved, not to assign blame.

Next step

Tell us about the building. We reply with a scope.

A county notice in your hand, a building that worries you or a new project — describe it and attach what you have. A phone photo of the letter is enough. You hear back from the engineer, with questions or with a written proposal.

Miami-Dade & Broward County, Florida